Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Housing › Affordable Housing
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 同工同酬
Personal answer不,政府绝不应该决定一个私有企业支付给员工的工资是什么 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
交通运输 › 公共交通
Personal answer不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
经济 › Church Tax
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
Personal answer不,政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
Personal answerMore, and privatize the entire healthcare industry |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
外交政策 › 北约
Personal answerNo, it is obsolete and should be abolished |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
Personal answer不 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
Personal answer是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资 |
交通运输 › 高速铁路
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
Personal answerYes, but I would prefer to abolish the European Union |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
Personal answer不管怎样,我们都应该停止一切社会福利项目。 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 公司税
Personal answerLower, but abolish the corporate taxes |
科学 › Genetic Engineering
Personal answerNo. The government should not fund anything. |
外交政策 › European Commission
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
Personal answerNo, and abolish NATO |
交通运输 › National Railway
Personal answerYes, but allow more local control |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
Personal answer不 |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
Personal answer是的 |
Technology › Data Privacy
Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
Personal answer不 |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
Personal answerNo, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
Personal answerNo, we should not get involved in this conflict |
交通运输 › Electric Vehicle Mandates
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
国家安全 › Facial Recognition
Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Backstop
Personal answerNo, this will prevent Britain from signing trade deals on its own |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
Personal answer不,但我们应该采取单边自由贸易政策 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answer不,政府在经济衰退期间应该大幅减少开支 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › Fuel Efficiency Requirements
Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › National Identification System
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › GPS Vehicle Tracking
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Diesel Emission Standards
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Bicycles and Bike Lanes
Personal answerYes. But privatization of roads is preferable |
经济 › 国内工作
Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
Personal answerNo. And the WB and IMF should be abolished. |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Personal answerNo, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Carpooling and Shared Transportation
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 关税
Personal answer不,全球自由贸易体系对我们的企业和消费者来说更好 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
教育 › School Truancy
Personal answer是的 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure
Personal answerYes. But privatize the roads. |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answerNo. The government should never bail out companies. |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
Personal answer不 |
Technology › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Shelters
Personal answer不 |
Housing › Rent Control
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Gaza ceasefire
Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Marketing Unhealthy Products to Youth
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Congestion Pricing
Personal answerYes, but preferably by privatizing the roads. |
国家安全 › Cross-border Payments
Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Criminal Justice Use of AI
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
Personal answerPalestine |
交通运输 › Ride-Sharing Subsidies
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Netanyahu Leadership
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
Personal answerYes, but the government should not interfere with the free market in money |
交通运输 › Autonomous Vehicle Regulation
Personal answer不 |
教育 › Charter Schools
Personal answerYes, and our entire education system should be privatized |
Housing › Foreign Real Estate Investment
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Restorative Justice Programs
Personal answer不 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
Personal answer不 |
科学 › Lab Grown Meat
Personal answerYes. But hopefully nobody buys it. |
科学 › CRISPR Technology
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Geoengineering
Personal answer不 |
Technology › Self Hosted Digital Wallets
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
Personal answerNo, and the US should leave NATO. |
Housing › Foreclosure Assistance
Personal answer不 |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
Personal answerNo, and citizens should be allowed to protect their savings from reckless fiscal policies or subjugation |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Carbon Capture Subsidies
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Designated Autonomous Vehicle Lanes
Personal answerMaybe. Privatize the roads and let the market decide |
国内政策 › TikTok Ban
Personal answerNo, only ban the use on government issues phones |
Housing › First-time Homebuyer Subsidies
Personal answer不 |
经济 › CEO Pay Cap
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Gig worker tax reporting
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Frequent Flier Regulation
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Advanced Automotive Technology
Personal answerNo. The government needs to stay completely out of the auto industry. |
交通运输 › Traditional Automotive Design
Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 24 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 27 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.