Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › Popular Vote
8>8 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerNo, and ban all gender transitioning treatments |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answerGenerell weniger Social Media sollte erlaubt sein. |
国内政策 › 视频监控
8>8 Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerJa, jedoch nur in Bereichen die keine staatliche Bezuschussung erhalten sollten, wie der gesamte Zweig um Einrichtungen und Pflege im Behindertenwesen. |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer否,而且应吊销持有双重国籍公民的身份 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answerNein, aber die EU gehört grundlegend reformiert. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
8>8 Personal answerInvestitionen oder gar nichts; keine finanziellen für schwache Länder, wenn wir dort keine langfristigen, wirtschaftlichen Interessen verfolgen. |
总统大选 › Presidential Election
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
8>8 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › National Railway
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › VAT Rates
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, but only on food and medicine |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answerZentraler Geheimdienst ja, bei Beibehaltung der einzelnen Dienste. |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
外交政策 › Backstop
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
8>8 Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 经济刺激
8>8 Personal answerJa, aber nur wenn unter Investitionen tatsächlich gemeint ist, dass wir umfassende wirtschaftlichen Einfluss erhalten. |
国内政策 › Civil Service
8>8 Personal answerVerbesserung deren Arbeitsqualität. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 希腊救助计划
8>8 Personal answerTheoretisch ja, man muss Griechenland stark in die Pflicht nehmen, sollte ihnen jedoch die Möglichkeit geben, ein eigenes Sparprogramm auszuarbeiten ggf. mit Hilfe. |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.