Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
9>9 Personal answerJA! Und der Staat sollte auch mal genauer manche religiösische Gruppen unter die Lupe nehmen um die auf zu decken die gegen Gleichgeschlechtliche Ehen sind und auch hetzen. Diese gehören definitiv beobachtet. Man darf glauben was man will, man hat aber kein recht jemand anderem was vor zu schreiben weil es DEINER ansicht nicht passt. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answerMüssen alle in Deutschland die hier wohnen und die Staatsbürgerschaft haben so einen Test machen? Wenn ja, dann ist es legitim wenn auch die Menschen vom Ausland die sich hier einbürgern wollen, dass sie so einen Test durchmachen müssen. Ansonsten fände ich eine Art Aufklärung wie hier alles läuft, ihre Rechte, Unterstützungen und sonst was wird ihnen beigebracht, sinnvoller. |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
9>9 Personal answerJa. Aufklären was für Drogen es gibt, welche Gefahren sie mit sich bringen und auch wie man sich hilfe holen kann falls man Süchtig wird. Eine Handhabung wie Alkohol wäre das besste |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answerMir egal |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › National Railway
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNein. Weil genau solche Menschen dringend Unterstützung und Hilfe brauchen. Ob Psychiatrische oder andere Medizinische. |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.