Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
总统大选 › Popular Vote
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Presidential Election
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › National Railway
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow more local control |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for employees that commit acts of discrimination |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for students that commit acts of discrimination |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
外交政策 › Backstop
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Civil Service
9>9 Personal answer下降 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 希腊救助计划
9>9 Personal answerAyuda a través del comercio y también con solidaridad por los de verdad necesitados. Bajo una Ley solidaria. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerNo, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
9>9 Personal answerNo, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety |
经济 › Stock Buybacks
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.