Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerOb die Steuern für Reiche erhöht wird oder nicht ist eh egal, da viele Reiche Tricks kennen, um sich dem Fiskus zu entziehen (z.B. Panama-Papers,...) |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answerJa, vorallem sollte der Staat die seit Jahrzehnten kaputt gesparte Infrastruktur reparieren, auch wenn es der eigenen Parteilinie widerspricht. |
总统大选 › Popular Vote
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Church Tax
9>9 Personal answerJa, warum sollte man einer Institution Geld dafür geben, dass sie z.B. Lgbtqia* verteufelt und gleichzeitig Kinder missbraucht werden. |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
9>9 Personal answerWenn wir sonst keine Allternativen hätten, dann schon, ansonsten bin ich da unentschlossen. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answerDas Militär sollte zumindest so ausgestattet werden, dass wir uns ggf. Verteidigen können. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们是欧盟公民的情况下 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerNein, stattdessen sollten die Politiker z.B. Ihre Stylisten und Berater aus eigener Tasche bezahlen und nicht mehr durch Steuergelder. |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
总统大选 › Presidential Election
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › National Railway
9>9 Personal answerAuf keinen Fall. Die ständigen Streiks und Bahnvorstände, die für extrem schlechte "Leistung" Millionen von Euro an Boni bekommen ist der beste Beweis dafür, dass Privatisierung auf Teufel komm raus nicht funktioniert. |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answerNein, aber sie gehört dringend demokratisiert und reformiert. --> Mehr Demokratie, weniger Mauscheleien. |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for teachers or faculty members that commit acts of prejudice |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, only for employees that commit acts of discrimination |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerEs gibt auch jüngere Politiker, die keine mentalen Kompetenzen haben. Daher ist ein solcher Test für über 75-Jährige unnötig. |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo, diversity training should be encouraged but not required |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
外交政策 › Backstop
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Civil Service
9>9 Personal answerDecreased, but increase for education, health, justice, security services |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerIn meinen Augen ist es ein Dilemma, einerseits gäbe es Möglichkeiten in verfügbaren Unterkünften zu schlafen, andererseits kann man die Leute nicht dazu zwingen. Generell sollte es viel mehr Sozialwohnungen geben, damit auch Ärmere sich ein warmes Zuhause leisten können. |
教育 › School Truancy
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerNo, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
9>9 Personal answerYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
9>9 Personal answerNo, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety |
教育 › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
外交政策 › Gaza ceasefire
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
9>9 Personal answerBoth equally |
外交政策 › Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Surcharge Ban
9>9 Personal answerYes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.