Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
TiS>TiS Personal answerPro-life, for the whole life, womb to tomb |
社会 › LGBT收养权
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, a mother and father structure is the best option for any child. Same-sex couples should only be able to adopt if there are not enough mother-and-father couples |
经济 › 同工同酬
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
社会 › 死刑
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, all humans, no matter how evil, have the right to live |
外交政策 › 联合国
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, in theory, the UN is a good idea, but it needs to be reformed to provide better solutions to the problems they are tackling |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
TiS>TiS Personal answer不 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
移民 › 公民考试
TiS>TiS Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but it should be implemented slowly in case it does not work |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
罪行 › Private Prisons
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
TiS>TiS Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的,但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but there should be mandatory rehabilitation for using drugs inappropriately |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, the importance of fossil fuels in today's society should be recognised, but we should move towards more sustainable energy |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › Animal Testing
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › 以色列
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, the US should not give aid to any foreign nations until the national debt is reduced |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but only for people with a history of dangerous drug use |
外交政策 › 外国援助
TiS>TiS Personal answerDecrease, the US should not give aid to any foreign nations until the national debt is reduced |
经济 › 公司税
TiS>TiS Personal answerLower for small businesses, and keep the same for mid- and large-sized business, but elimate loopholes |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › 工会
TiS>TiS Personal answerHurt in some areas, and help in others, but private unions ultimately help |
医保 › 安全港
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
医保 › World Health Organization
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
TiS>TiS Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, this discriminates against people who are allergic to the vaccine or can't have it for other reasons |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
TiS>TiS Personal answer不 |
教育 › School Truancy
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but it should remain illegal |
教育 › Charter Schools
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, and education should not be privatized |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, this gives unnecessary power to the government and would waste taxpayer money |
医保 › COVID-19 Vaccine
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but immediately after frontline workers, elderly, and those at higher risk than me receive it |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.